The Anti-Riddle Game

NOTE: THIS IS A THINKING GAME OF TWISTED LOGIC

The forum has been dead recently, so I'm attempting to revive it with a game I made. It might be too complicated though, so I don't know how long it will last.

The aim of the game is to find as many answers to one riddle as possible, no matter how ridiculous they are. It's basically a game about finding loopholes in riddles.

The asker can add restrictions to their riddle, but it must still be possible for the original answer to still apply. However, try to at least leave one "loophole" to make it fun.

The answerer can ask the asker to define certain words if they're too vague.

FOR EXAMPLE:

Riddle:
Mary's father has 5 children. Four of them, from youngest to oldest, are named January, February, March, and April. What is the oldest child named?

Answer(s):
1. Mary
2. April. Mary wasn't in the list of youngest to oldest so there was no way to know whether she was the oldest child or the youngest child. This leaves April as the oldest.

The person who creates the most answers wins and gets the next riddle. If it ties, the person who said the most first gets it.


I'll go first:
How can you physically stand behind your friend's back as he physically stands behind yours?

"Behind" is defined like this: If one friend were to move towards the other friend, he would at some point touch the other friend's back.

(For the record, I did leave a "loophole" answer.)

You stand back to back?
That's the only one I can think of...

Im going with Helens answer o-o

a wall could bve between them or it could be a photo of his back standing in your back

You stand behind his back while his back is also facing a mirror that you stand between on an angle so that you are standing behind him and behind his back, without be technicaly facing behind him

Thatsss confusing lol

That technically works though... i think.... I think lars is winning...

Lets just go with Larzes answer because I dont think anyone can come up with anything better lol

Yay

They could be preparing to do that weird side hug thing, in reality part of their backs would be touching, but only a small amount

Or if you look at it in a huge perspective, if both guys faced eachother and started walking backwards, they would eventually touch backs.

Anyone got a new one?

Ok nowwww I think thats the best we can come up with

Kish's answer was the one I was thinking of when I wrote this.

So it's my turn, hmm.
How bout we hyperanalyze an old favourite?

There's a dog sleeping in the middle of a lightless road, a car comes and easily turns around the dog, how was the dog seen?

I've thought of about 6 or 7. So go nuts with this one

It had a light up/reflect tape collar ._. or something to do with lights on the dog. Maybe moonlight reflected off of its dog tags. Or sunlight, whichever

PERHAPS IT WAS A CYBORG DOG AND IT EMITTED LIGHTS, WHEN IT AWOKE IT STARTED SHOOTING AT THE CAR THINKING IT WOULD RUN IT OVER SO THE DRIVER TRIED TO RUN IT OVER BUT FAILED MISERABLY AND ENDED UP TURNING AROUND IT.
SINCE THE CYBORG DOG REALISED IT WASN'T BEING ATTACKED ANYMORE. IT WENT BACK INTO HIBERNATION MODE

hahaha ;D

1.- The car haves lights DUH!
2.- An UFO wanted to abduct the dog, so all the light coming from it Iluminated the Dog's area
3.- A Forestkeeper (or W/E) was going by and had a lantern and was gonna cross the road, so he Iluminated the dog and then corssed after the car

nothing else for now ._.
g2g do Homewarks D:

its day outside
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff-

Growlithe used flamethrower.

could have said the dog was actually a growlithe.
Or any assortment of dog pokemon like houndoom or something.

I'm just gonna give it to Alek, because yes, the rules of the game slightly confuse me :\

1. The car got lucky
2. The person was blind and gained super sensory abilities and could sense the dog through echolocation
3. The car conveniently hit a rock and swerved away from the dog. The driver then returned the car to normal positioning.
4. The dog was barking and the person avoided it
5. The roads were built as such. The car went literally went AROUND the dog sleeping in the middle of the road
................-------------------............
................I.................I.............
................I-------D--------I............
................I.................I.............
................C----------------I.............

Kevins answers seem more practical ._.

6. The dog was on fire
7. The car was on fire
8. The road was on fire

Well it did say a "lightless road"

The world was somehow destroyed, the car didn't even make it near the dog as it was airborne